CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2018-00344 PICK`N PAY RETAILERS (PTY) LTD vs. JUSTIN MELVILLE
  airpnp.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00345 ABSA GROUP LIMITED vs. PATRICK LUTHULI
  abzabank.co.za - Pending
abzabnk.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00343 PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA vs. SBUSISO MTHIMUNYE
  prasa.web.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00342 BRIDGESTONE SOUTH AFRICA HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  superquick.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00341 ABSA GROUP LIMITED vs. ABSA COURAGE
  absaco.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00340 KEVINS CLASSROOM (PTY) LTD vs. INVENTIS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD
  kevinsclassroom.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00339 HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH CO. KG vs. YE GENRONG
  hugoboss.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00338 WHATSAPP INC. vs. ESTERNO PVT
  whatsapp.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00337 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. MARK SING
  absa.web.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00336 ABSA GROUP LIMITED vs. MOHAMED ADAM
  absamustfall.co.za - Pending
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.