CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2019-00359 COMAIR LIMITED vs. SANDILE MAVUSO
  kululaIT.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00358 GLASSDOOR INC. vs. NAMEADVERT LIMITED
  glassdoor.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00357 COOLSYSTEM, INC.DOING BUSINESS AS GAME READY vs. GAME READY SOUTH AFRICA
  gameready.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00356 ABSA GROUP LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY AS ABSA BANK LIMITED) vs. JACO VAN DER VYVER
  absafleetservices.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00355 HELIVATE HELICOPTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD vs. CORRIE FOLLIS
  Decision: Helivate Helicopter Services (Pty) Ltd vs. Corrie Follis helivate.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00354 THE NAME LLC vs. OSWALD BANIEKONA
  4040clubcapetown.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00353 HULAMIN LIMITED vs. KALUSHI MOKOENA
  hulamins.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00352 ATHENA COSMTICS INC. vs. NADIA BREDENHANN (ALBERT BREDENHANN)
  revitalash.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00351 SAMANCOR CHROME LIMITED vs. THABO SEPHIRI
  Decision: Samancor Chrome Limited vs. Thabo Sephiri samacor.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00350 AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (ANC) vs. UNWEMBI COMMUNICATIONS
  Decision: African National Congress (ANC) vs. Unwembi Communications anc.org.za - Refused
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.