CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR	DECISION
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 All	All Appeal - Refused Appeal - Transfer Decision - Refuse Decision - Transfer Informal Mediation - Settled Pending Settled Summary Decision - Transfer Withdrawn
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
Displaying the latest 10 cases

ZA2018-00319	ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. DIETER HERBST
	abza.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00318	ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. LLEWELLYN CROSBY
	abbsa.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00317	TRACTOR GIANTS PTY LTD vs. REON CRONJE
	tractorgiants.co.za - Pending tractor-giants.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00316	AGRO-SERVE PROPRIETARY LIMITED vs. NOKTA INTERNET TEKNOLOJILERI SAN. & TIC. A.S.
	wonder.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00315	THE SAN LAMEER MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION NPC AND SAN LAMEER VILLAS RENTALS (PTY) LTD vs. CARON HORN
	stayatsanlameer.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00314	UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG vs. URSULA JOUBERT
	uj.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00313	ANDREY TERNOVSKIY vs. YOUR.CO.ZA SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
	chatroulette.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00312	ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. DOM FORCE
	absamobi.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer

ZA2018-00311	ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. DOMAIN NAME RENTAL AND SALES
	absasure.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00310	ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. ALEKS RUDY
	absacrypto.co.za - Pending

notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.