CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2018-00351 SAMANCOR CHROME LIMITED vs. THABO SEPHIRI
  samacor.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00350 AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (ANC) vs. UNWEMBI COMMUNICATIONS
  anc.org.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00349 SAMANCOR CHROME LIMITED vs. AVALIANI SERGI
  Decision: Samancor Chrome Limited vs. Avaliani Sergi samanco.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00348 BRIDGESTONE MAXIPREST vs. JAMES SAI
  Decision: Bridgestone Maxiprest vs. James Sai speedycars.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00347 CYPRESS HOUSE TRADING CC T/A HYDROPONICS.CO.ZA vs. MICHAEL UPTON
  biobizz.co.za - Pending
hydroponics.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00346 THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE BAKER STREET TRUST vs. CHRIS SURREPT
  Decision: The Trustees for the Time Being of the Baker Street Trust vs. Chris Surrept pgglasswindscreen.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00345 ABSA GROUP LIMITED vs. PATRICK LUTHULI
  Decision: Absa Group Limited vs. Patrick Luthuli abzabank.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Absa Group Limited vs. Patrick Luthuli abzabnk.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00344 PICK`N PAY RETAILERS (PTY) LTD vs. JUSTIN MELVILLE
  Decision: Pick`n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd vs. Justin Melville airpnp.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00343 PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA vs. SBUSISO MTHIMUNYE
  Decision: Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa vs. Sbusiso Mthimunye prasa.web.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00342 BRIDGESTONE SOUTH AFRICA HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  Decision: Bridgestone South Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze superquick.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.