CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR	DECISION
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 All	All Appeal - Refused Appeal - Transfer Decision - Refuse Decision - Transfer Informal Mediation - Settled Pending Settled Summary Decision - Transfer Withdrawn
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
Displaying the latest 10 cases

ZA2019-00359	COMAIR LIMITED vs. SANDILE MAVUSO
	kululaIT.co.za - Pending

ZA2019-00358	GLASSDOOR INC. vs. NAMEADVERT LIMITED
	glassdoor.co.za - Pending

ZA2019-00357	COOLSYSTEM, INC.DOING BUSINESS AS GAME READY vs. GAME READY SOUTH AFRICA
	gameready.co.za - Pending

ZA2019-00356	ABSA GROUP LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY AS ABSA BANK LIMITED) vs. JACO VAN DER VYVER
	absafleetservices.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00355	HELIVATE HELICOPTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD vs. CORRIE FOLLIS
	helivate.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer

ZA2018-00354	THE NAME LLC vs. OSWALD BANIEKONA
	4040clubcapetown.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00353	HULAMIN LIMITED vs. KALUSHI MOKOENA
	hulamins.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00352	ATHENA COSMTICS INC. vs. NADIA BREDENHANN (ALBERT BREDENHANN)
	revitalash.co.za - Pending

ZA2018-00351	SAMANCOR CHROME LIMITED vs. THABO SEPHIRI
	samacor.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer

ZA2018-00350	AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (ANC) vs. UNWEMBI COMMUNICATIONS
	anc.org.za - Refused

notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.