CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2019-00374 HENDRIK VAN WYK VERVOER (PTY) LTD vs. ALMERO BOURBON
  hendrikvanwykvervoer.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00373 AFRIBET ( PTY) LTD vs. BARRY MURRELL
  afribet.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00372 JOHN PLANETS vs. DATA PROTECTED
  armytek.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00371 EAZI ACCESS RENTAL (PTY) LTD. vs. CHRIS LEE
  eaziaccess.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00370 FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED vs. DOM FORCE
  Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force firstnational-bank.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force fnbbank.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force fnbhomeloans.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00369 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. RONY RICH
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Rony Rich sarss.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00368 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. PIETER PIETERSE
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Pieter Pieterse sarstaxclearance.co.za - Withdrawn
   
   
ZA2019-00367 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. PORCHESTER PARTNERS INC.
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Porchester Partners Inc. sarseffiling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00366 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze wwwsarsefiling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze sarsefing.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze sarsefling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00365 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. JONAS PITTS
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Jonas Pitts sars-office - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00364 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. FURNCO TRUST
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Furnco Trust mysars.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00363 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. NEVILLE GRUSKIN
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Neville Gruskin sarsefilingassistant.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Neville Gruskin sarsefilingassist.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00362 NASPERS LTD vs. PATRICK AMMANN
  Decision: Naspers Ltd vs. Patrick Ammann nasperssa.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00361 RIEMLAND ROUTE vs. GU GE
  riemlandroute.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00360 PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. IVOR CHIPKIN
  pari.org.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00359 COMAIR LIMITED vs. SANDILE MAVUSO
  Decision: Comair Limited vs. Sandile Mavuso kululaIT.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00358 GLASSDOOR INC. vs. NAMEADVERT LIMITED
  Decision: Glassdoor Inc. vs. NameAdvert Limited glassdoor.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00357 COOLSYSTEM, INC.DOING BUSINESS AS GAME READY vs. GAME READY SOUTH AFRICA
  gameready.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00356 ABSA GROUP LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY AS ABSA BANK LIMITED) vs. JACO VAN DER VYVER
  Decision: Absa Group Limited (previously as Absa Bank Limited) vs. Jaco Van Der Vyver absafleetservices.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2018-00355 HELIVATE HELICOPTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD vs. CORRIE FOLLIS
  Decision: Helivate Helicopter Services (Pty) Ltd vs. Corrie Follis helivate.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.