CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2016-00253 TELKOM SA SOC LIMITED vs. LUCIO HELENO GUILHERMINO CAMPOS
  yellowp.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2016-00252 TRAX IT SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD vs. ALEX MINJA
  youwinlaw.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2016-00251 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. JAMES SAI
  absapersonalloans.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2016-00250 TIMES MEDIA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED vs. JAMES SAI
  Decision: Times Media (Proprietary) Limited vs. James Sai sundaytimeslive.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2016-00249 TIMES MEDIA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED vs. REGISTRATION PRIVATE
  Decision: Times Media (Proprietary) Limited vs. Registration Private t1meslive.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2016-00248 TIMES MEDIA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  timeslives.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2016-00247 THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE NELSON MANDELA FOUNDATION TRUST vs. RICKI ALLEMANN
  Decision: The Trustees for the time being of the Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust vs. Ricki Allemann rememberingmadiba.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2016-00246 BROTHER INTERNATIONAL SA (PTY) LTD vs. ROBTRADE 6 CC
  brotheronline.co.za - Pending
brothersales.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2016-00245 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  Decision: Kentucky Fried Chicken International Holdings, Inc vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze kfclistens.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2016-00244 INTEX MARKETING LTD vs. DEWAN HATTINGH
  Decision: Intex Marketing Ltd vs. Dewan Hattingh intexpools.co.za - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.