news

Domain Names - The High Court Has Its Say >> read

Registry and registrar not liable for infringing domain names >> read

A Brief Excursus on the South African Online Alternative Dispute Resolution >> read

.za Alternative Dispute Resolution Regulations: The First Few SAIIPL Decisions >> read

A study of the adjudication of celebrity domain name disputes (Neil Brown QC) >> read

Sun International successful with suncityvacation.co.za domain name dispute. >> read

MIXIT.CO.ZA: Dont get mixed up! >> read

MXit wins mixit.co.za battle >> read

The citroen.co.za Dispute is Decided (Tribute Site): >> read

Is your business prepared for Domain Hijacking? by Cheryl L. Hodgson >> read


Subscribe to our newsletter and we will keep you posted with co.za domain name news and related events:


Your email address

Enter verification code below:


Adjudicators preside over domain dispute matters:

Alan Dunlop, Hahn & Hahn Inc. Alan Dunlop
Hahn & Hahn Inc.
Senior Adjudicator
Tana Pistorius, Department of Mercantile Law, UNISA Tana Pistorius
Department of Mercantile Law, UNISA
Senior Adjudicator
Dr Wim Alberts, Bowman Gilfillan Inc Dr Wim Alberts
Bowman Gilfillan Inc
Senior Adjudicator

CO.ZA DOMAIN DISPUTE RESOLUTION

The South African Institute of Intellectual Property Law (SAIIPL) is accredited as a dispute resolution provider in terms of the .za Alternate Dispute Resolution Regulations.

Previously, the only possible action which could be taken against the unauthorised registration of a co.za domain name was to institute court proceedings for trade mark infringement in South Africa. However, a new procedure, which is very similar to the procedure followed by WIPO in its administration of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, was introduced in South Africa on 1 April 2007 and SAIIPL has been accredited as a dispute resolution service provider by the Department of Communications.

The new procedure entitles any party to lodge a complaint against a co.za domain if the domain name "takes unfair advantage of the rights" of that party or "is contrary to law or likely to give offence to any class of persons". Complaints can be filed against domain names which incorporate registered trade marks or even trade marks which are not registered but which are well known. Complaints can also be filed against domain names which amount to hate speech or racism or any other such names which are contrary to public policy.

The new procedure provides a cost efficient and expeditious resolution of domain name disputes. Disputes filed with SAIIPL are normally concluded within two to three months, using on-line procedures, whereas court litigation would take significantly longer. Fees are also much lower than normal litigation.

SAIIPL was established in 1954 and represents over 140 patent attorneys, patent agents, trade mark practitioners and academics in South Africa who specialise in the field of Intellectual Property Law. SAIIPL has a large panel of independent and experienced adjudicators, taken from the most experienced practising attorneys, advocates and academics in the field, to determine disputes lodged with it.

The development is to be welcomed and goes a long way to ensuring that South Africa is keeping pace with international developments.

 

About the SAIIPL

The South African Institute of Intellectual Property Law (SAIIPL) was established in 1954 and represents over 140 patent attorneys, patent agents, trade mark practitioners and academics in South Africa who specialise in the field of Intellectual Property Law. The SAIIPL is widely regarded as the custodian of South Africa's intellectual property rights, and comprises practicing attorneys, academics, practitioners in businesses and in general, people interested in the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.